Ep 25. Copping out on a cousin

In this episode of The People's Court, titled "Copping out on a Cousin," two cousins bring their dispute to the courtroom. The plaintiff claims that the defendant borrowed money from him to purchase a car, and promised to make regular payments until the debt was paid off. However, the defendant stopped making payments after only a few months, leaving the plaintiff to foot the remaining bill.

The plaintiff argues that he has texts and messages from the defendant acknowledging the debt and promising to pay it back, but the defendant disputes this claim. She argues that she never agreed to the terms that the plaintiff is proposing, and that the money was simply a gift between family members.

As the case unfolds, Judge Marilyn Milian questions both parties and examines the evidence presented. She brings in an expert to testify about the value of the car in question, and pushes both sides to be honest about their motives and their interpretations of the situation.

Throughout the case, tensions run high between the two cousins and their families. Each side is convinced that they are in the right, and each accuses the other of dishonesty and manipulation. Judge Milian tries to keep the proceedings focused and civil, but there are moments of anger and frustration from both sides.

In the end, the judge delivers her verdict. Without giving away any spoilers, it is clear that she has taken a thoughtful and impartial approach to this case. She considers the evidence presented, the testimony of the expert witness, and the conflicting stories from both sides.

Overall, this episode of The People's Court provides a compelling look at a dispute that is all too common in families: financial obligations and expectations between relatives. Through the lens of this particular case, viewers can see the importance of clear communication and mutual understanding, even when dealing with close family members.