Ep 33. Michelle v Shell

Michelle is taking former friend, Shell, to court over an unpaid debt. Michelle claims that Shell borrowed £600 and has yet to return it, despite numerous promises and messages. Shell disputes the debt, saying that it was not a loan but rather a gift. She also claims that Michelle has been harassing and threatening her over the matter.

As the case proceeds, Judge Rinder digs deeper into the details of the dispute. Michelle brings up messages between her and Shell in which Shell repeatedly promises to pay back the money. Shell argues that those messages were taken out of context and that she never intended to repay Michelle.

Throughout the case, Judge Rinder maintains his characteristic wit and humor, but also takes the matter seriously. He asks both parties pointed questions, trying to get to the heart of the dispute.

Michelle is frustrated by the proceedings, feeling like her case is not being taken seriously. She becomes emotional as the case progresses and accuses Shell of lying. Shell, on the other hand, seems calm and collected, but Judge Rinder is not swayed by appearances.

As the case comes to a close, Judge Rinder delivers his verdict. He takes into account the messages between Michelle and Shell, as well as the evidence presented by both parties. He also takes into account the fact that Shell did not deny that the money was borrowed, only that it was a gift.

Ultimately, Judge Rinder rules in Michelle's favor. He orders Shell to pay back the full amount of the debt, plus interest, and admonishes her for not taking the matter more seriously. Michelle is visibly relieved by the verdict, while Shell is clearly unhappy.

The episode serves as a reminder of the importance of clear communication and honesty in financial dealings. It also highlights the role that small claims court can play in resolving disputes between individuals.