Ep 20. Manni and Danny v David

Manni and Danny, two friends, have been in a dispute with David, a former business partner, over a commercial property deal. Manni and Danny claim that they invested a significant amount of money in the property with the understanding that they would be joint owners with David. However, David denies any agreement and claims that Manni and Danny were simply investors.

Judge Rinder hears both sides of the case and examines the evidence presented. Manni and Danny provide receipts and bank statements as proof of their investment, while David argues that they were simply lending money to him as an investor.

As the case progresses, tensions rise between the parties, with Manni and Danny accusing David of dishonesty and David accusing Manni and Danny of being motivated by greed. Judge Rinder attempts to maintain order and focus on the facts of the case.

Ultimately, Judge Rinder must determine whether there was a verbal agreement between the parties or whether Manni and Danny were simply investors. He also must consider the amount of money each party invested and whether there is any right to joint ownership of the property.

The episode is filled with dramatic moments as the parties argue and Judge Rinder tries to maintain order and focus on the evidence. Viewers are left wondering how Judge Rinder will rule in this complex case.