Ep 310. Abysmal Wedding DJ?!; I'm Not Paying for Your Child!

In this episode of Judge Judy, we are introduced to a case involving a wedding DJ who allegedly ruined a couple's big day and is now demanding payment for his services. The plaintiff, who hired the DJ, claims that he played inappropriate music during the reception, did not follow their requested playlist, and failed to announce key events such as the cutting of the cake and the first dance.

The defendant, the wedding DJ himself, argues that he did his job to the best of his ability and that the couple did not adequately communicate their preferences to him. He also claims that the bride was difficult to work with and that her demands were unreasonable.

As the case unfolds, Judge Judy hears from both parties and attempts to get to the bottom of what really happened on the day of the wedding. She questions the DJ on his professionalism and asks for evidence of the agreed-upon playlist. She also asks the couple why they did not make their displeasure known on the day of the wedding and whether they attempted to remedy the situation before withholding payment.

But the case takes an unexpected turn when the defendant reveals that he has a child who is in need of medical treatment and that he needs the money from the wedding gig to pay for it. The couple, who had been adamant about not paying for the DJ's services, are now faced with a moral dilemma. Should they still refuse to pay, knowing that doing so could harm an innocent child in need of medical care?

Judge Judy ultimately makes a ruling in the case, weighing the evidence presented by both sides and considering the unique circumstances surrounding the DJ's personal situation. In the end, it is up to the couple to decide whether or not they will follow the judge's ruling—and whether or not they will extend compassion to the defendant and his child.