Ep 8. Oral Contracts
- TVPG
- December 4, 2007
- 43 min
-
7.5 (290)
The episode “Oral Contracts” from Boston Legal's season 4 is an exciting legal drama that follows the story of a couple, Tom and Louise, who thought that their oral agreement would suffice as a legal contract. They sold their home to a couple, the Wallaces, and promised to provide them with certain amenities. However, when the Wallaces noticed that the amenities were missing, they sued Tom and Louise.
The lawsuit reaches Crane, Poole, and Schmidt (CPS), and Alan Shore, who was once suspended from the firm, is now back in action. He criticizes his colleagues for overlooking the legalities and obstacles of oral contracts and urges them to settle the case. Meanwhile, Shirley Schmidt, who is defending Tom and Louise, argues that oral contracts can be legally binding if they meet certain conditions. Richard Fish, who is representing the Wallaces, is convinced that oral contracts are not legally binding and is seeking a win.
The case escalates, and emotions run high, leading to a string of witty comments and confrontations that Boston Legal is renowned for. From Alan Shore's logical reasoning to Richard Fish's comic relief, the episode doesn't lose its pace for a single moment. The drama also delves into various legal implications and ethical grounds involved in such cases.
As the case progresses, tensions rise, and both sides seem to have a compelling argument. Alan Shore gets intrigued and starts digging deep into the Wallaces' past, hoping to find some leverage. He discovers a secret about the Wallaces that could turn the case in favor of Tom and Louise. Meanwhile, Denny Crane joins the legal battle and brings his unique charm. His unpredictable behavior and crude remarks continue to surprise viewers.
The case approaches its climax, and it is up to Shirley Schmidt to deliver the final verdict. The episode ends with a twist and leaves viewers on the edge of their seats as they eagerly wait for the next episode.
In summary, “Oral Contracts” is a thrilling and thought-provoking episode that challenges the viewer's understanding of legal contracts. The show's humor, character depth, and ethical considerations make it not only a legal drama but an excellent TV series.